Remember when qualifying leads was simple? Marketing would hand over MQLs to sales, and sales would work their magic to convert them into SQLs. Those days are gone! The rise of product-led growth (the strategy lets users try your product for free before they make a financial commitment) in SaaS has changed everything about how we identify and qualify potential customers.

The traditional MQL/SQL model worked well in an enterprise sales-led world. Marketing teams would score leads based on website visits, content downloads, and form fills. Sales would then qualify these leads through calls and emails. But here's the problem: none of these activities tells us if someone will actually use and get value from our product.
Think about it, someone might download five whitepapers and attend three webinars, making them a "hot" MQL. But what if they never open your product? Or what if they do, but barely use its core features? That's why we need a better way.
Simply switching from MQL scoring to PQL scoring still misses half the picture. Product usage tells you engagement, not fit. A user might love your tool, but be from a company that will never buy.
That’s why modern PLG teams use dual scoring - evaluating both fit (who they are) and activity (what they do).
This approach aligns Sales, Marketing, and Product around one truth: the best leads are those who both fit your ICP and get value from your product.

A Product Qualified Lead is someone who has demonstrated real value from your product through actual usage. Instead of guessing whether someone might be interested based on marketing activities, PQLs show us who's already getting value.
For example, let's say you offer a team collaboration tool. A PQL might be a user who has:
These actions show they're actually experiencing the value your product provides - something no amount of website visits can tell you.

EQLs take this a step further. These are existing customers showing signs they could benefit from additional features or higher-tier plans. They're particularly valuable in SaaS, where expansion revenue often drives growth.
Signs of an EQL might include:

Many companies trying to modernize their approach simply switch from MQL scoring to PQL scoring. Now they're missing half the picture. Just because someone uses your product heavily doesn't mean they're a good fit for your business.
This is where dual scoring comes in.
Dual scoring looks at two complementary dimensions:
Fit Score - How well the user matches your ideal customer profile (ICP):
Activity Score - How actively they use your product:
When you combine these scores, you get a much clearer picture of your best opportunities through our AI-based scoring. A high-fit, high-activity user is your dream customer. They're not just using your product - they're the type of customer you can grow with.
Now that we understand the “what” and “why,” let’s dive into the “how.” You have two clear paths to implement PQL and EQL scoring: a manual, do-it-yourself process, or leveraging an automated solution like Intempt’s Fit and Activity model.
Let's look at both:
For those who are not yet ready to invest in an automated system, a manual process can be a viable starting point. Here’s how you can do it:
But let's be real - this is time-consuming and hard to scale. As your user base grows, maintaining accurate, real-time scoring becomes nearly impossible.
Instead of juggling everything manually, let AI-based marketing automation tools handle your dual-scoring workflow. It’s more than a tool; it’s your agentic co-marketer, guiding you every step of the way. Here's how this process typically works:
This AI tool automatically segments users based on your predefined ICP criteria. As soon as a new user comes in, their data is evaluated against your target profile.

The platform continuously monitors user interactions - whether it’s feature usage, session duration, or login frequency - to keep the activity score up to date.

By merging the fit and activity scores, the tool immediately identifies which users qualify as high-potential leads (PQLs) or expansion opportunities (EQLs). This AI-based automation eliminates manual labor and guesswork.
With automation, you can set up workflows that automatically route high-scoring leads to your sales or customer success teams, ensuring timely and personalized follow-up.

The key advantage of this automated approach is that your team can focus on engaging with qualified leads rather than spending time identifying them.
Using Intempt, you can evaluate your leads through custom Fit & Activity scoring. It’s all about creating a matrix that uses fit attributes (like job title and industry) and activity events (like signups and logins). Leads are scored as “Low,” “Medium,” or “High,” ensuring you always have actionable insights. Qualifying leads early on is crucial to avoid wasted resources and improve sales success.
Fit Criteria include things like company size, role, and budget authority. The goal is to make sure this lead could be a good long-term customer.
Activity Criteria look at how users are engaging - what features are they exploring, and are they using the product consistently?
Score Decay: Ensure your scores are up to date by implementing decay for inactivity. Leads that have not interacted in a set period should see a reduction in their activity score, ensuring your sales team only focuses on leads with ongoing interest.
Scores are updated dynamically as user behavior evolves, which means your sales team always knows when it’s the right time to reach out.




Transitioning to PQL and EQL scoring isn’t just a new metric; it’s a mindset shift. It means aligning your GTM motion with how customers actually buy and grow in the SaaS era.
To start:
The goal isn’t more leads, it’s better-qualified leads.
Whether you use Intempt or another platform, dual scoring ensures your teams focus on users most likely to convert, expand, and stay.
1) How do you hand off a PQL from product to sales?
Define a clear hand-off process: when a user hits your activity threshold and meets fit criteria, trigger a workflow that alerts sales or success. Ensure product, marketing, and sales agree on the thresholds (for example: 3 key feature uses + company size fits ICP) and that the handoff path (via CRM/automation) is mapped and documented.
2) What if a user is highly active but doesn’t match our ideal customer profile (ICP)?
This is a common situation. High activity but weak fit signals indicate a usage-fit mismatch. While they show engagement, they may not become long-term customers or scale well. In dual scoring, these leads get high Activity but low Fit. Treat them as nurture candidates rather than hot leads.
3) How often should fit and activity scores be updated or decayed?
Update in real-time or at a regular cadence (daily/weekly) so your scoring remains relevant. For decay: set thresholds for inactivity (e.g., no login in 30 days) and reduce the activity score accordingly. Intempt does this holistically.
4) Can dual scoring replace traditional MQL/SQL processes completely?
This is a very frequent question. Dual scoring doesn’t remove the concepts of MQL or SQL - it enhances them for a product-led growth model. Think of Fit+Activity as a layer that refines who becomes an MQL or SQL. In PLG contexts, the user-activity component becomes critical, so yes, you may rely less on classic MQLs and shift efforts to PQL/EQL routing.
5) How do I keep lead scores updated in real time?
You can use Intempt to automatically refresh Fit and Activity scores as users interact with your product, so your sales team always works with the latest, most accurate data.
Sure! You can test out Webflow on our free plan where you can experiment with 2 projects. Your unhosted projects will have a two-page limit, but you can purchase a site plan on a per-project basis to unlock up to 100 static pages and additional CMS pages.
A project is a website that you build in Webflow. You can publish projects to a webflow.io staging subdomain for free, export the code on a paid plan, or add a site plan to connect your custom domain and unlock hosting features.
Pro accounts can add their own logo to Client Billing forms and the Editor. Pro accounts can also remove references to Webflow in the source code and form submission emails, and hide the Webflow badge from their staging sites.
Webflow hosting scales automatically to handle millions of concurrent visits. All site plans serve sites through our Amazon's Cloudfront CDN and accelerated using Fastly, loading sites in milliseconds.
We offer fast email support to paid accounts and prioritized help for team accounts. Community support (forum.webflow.com) is available to free accounts.
If you're new to building websites, our video tutorials will get up and running quickly. If you already know concepts behind CSS and the box model, you will feel at home in Webflow.
Discover marketing workspace where you turn audiences into revenue.
Learn about Intempt%20In-Depth%20Comparison.png)
Marketers want seamless customer journeys, not a maze of rules and manual triggers. If the system feels like work, it’s not automation, it’s stress in a shiny UI. Klaviyo has long been the go-to for e-commerce platforms, powering email, SMS, and now even WhatsApp automation. But 2025 teams want more than AI that writes better subject lines; they want an AI comarketer that thinks ahead. In this comparison, we’ll explore Intempt v/s Klaviyo with a sharp focus on their Journeys to help you find out which one delivers true AI-powered orchestration rather than just automated messaging.
%20In-Depth%20Comparison.png)
Marketers don’t just want to test ideas; they want to turn those ideas into real customer experiences. Simple A/B tests and standard conversion lifts were once the gold standard, but now they have become the ghost of the past, because in 2025, growth teams demand more. They want to personalize in real time, orchestrate intelligently, and connect experiment results to revenue outcomes.
%20In-Depth%20Comparison.png)
Marketers and product teams thrive on data, and let’s be honest, they hate it when it’s scattered across 2-3 different tools, buried in dashboards, and takes a ton of their time just to get a half-answer. Mixpanel has long been the gold standard for analytics, but 2025 teams want more than charts and funnels; they want action. They want orchestration, personalization, and a clear line from insight to revenue. In this comparison, we’re putting Intempt vs. Mixpanel under the microscope, feature by feature, insight by insight, to help you find the smarter and more future-ready analytics partner for your team.
Zero theory or mindset discussions here; just actionable marketing tactics that will grow revenue today.